***157

Article in DSPDesignLine.com: M-QAM symbol error

Its been a nice week for me, wherein I guest posted an article in DSPDesignLine.com. :)

The article derives the theoretical symbol error rate for M-QAM modulation. The theoretical results are further supplemented by Matlab/Octave simulation scripts.

Those who are familiar with derivation of symbol error rate for 16-QAM modulation will find the equations easy to interpret. As we did for 16-QAM,

(a) We identify the three different types of symbols - corner, inside, neither inside nor corner.

(b) Then we find the symbol error probability for each of the three types of symbols

(c) Total error probability is found assuming that all the symbols are equally likely.

Click here to read the article published in DSPDesignLine.com

The same article is cross-posted also in Embedded.com

For those who are not interested in the full article, the probability of error for M-QAM modulation is,

. :)

Please click here to SUBSCRIBE to newsletter and download the FREE e-Book on probability of error in AWGN. Thanks for visiting! Happy learning.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

If you liked this post, you may leave a comment below, or subscribe to the RSS feed.

You may also find these posts relevant...
  • Comparing BPSK, QPSK, 4PAM, 16QAM, 16PSK, 64QAM and 32PSK
  • Bit error rate for 16PSK modulation using Gray mapping
  • Comparing 16PSK vs 16QAM for symbol error rate
  • 16QAM Bit Error Rate (BER) with Gray mapping
  • Articles
  • Comments

    No comments yet.

    Leave a comment

    (required)

    (required)