<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Transmit beamforming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dsplog.com/2009/04/13/transmit-beamforming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2009/04/13/transmit-beamforming/</link>
	<description>Signal Processing for Communication</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:03:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krishna Sankar</title>
		<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2009/04/13/transmit-beamforming/#comment-73909</link>
		<dc:creator>Krishna Sankar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 14:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dsplog.com/?p=535#comment-73909</guid>
		<description>@flz: the noise term n is a voltage term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@flz: the noise term n is a voltage term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flz</title>
		<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2009/04/13/transmit-beamforming/#comment-72852</link>
		<dc:creator>flz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 02:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dsplog.com/?p=535#comment-72852</guid>
		<description>In &quot;y1 = sum(h.*sr,1) + 10^(-Eb_N0_dB(ii)/20)*n; &quot;  why use &quot; 10^(-Eb_N0_dB(ii)/20)*n; &quot;  not &quot;10^(-Eb_N0_dB(ii)/10)*n; &quot; ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In &#8220;y1 = sum(h.*sr,1) + 10^(-Eb_N0_dB(ii)/20)*n; &#8221;  why use &#8221; 10^(-Eb_N0_dB(ii)/20)*n; &#8221;  not &#8220;10^(-Eb_N0_dB(ii)/10)*n; &#8221; ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krishna Sankar</title>
		<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2009/04/13/transmit-beamforming/#comment-24873</link>
		<dc:creator>Krishna Sankar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 23:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dsplog.com/?p=535#comment-24873</guid>
		<description>@Osama: We have an array in the transmitter and at the transmitter we know the channel, dont we? We can use that information to get the performance gains</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Osama: We have an array in the transmitter and at the transmitter we know the channel, dont we? We can use that information to get the performance gains</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Osama</title>
		<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2009/04/13/transmit-beamforming/#comment-24826</link>
		<dc:creator>Osama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 18:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dsplog.com/?p=535#comment-24826</guid>
		<description>Hello,
I just want to ask why the informed 2x1 coincides with the 1x2 system regarding the BER? As we know we have &#039;Array Gain&#039; in the latter scenario and we don&#039;t have it in the former one.
Does this have to do with Eb/No instead of SNR?
Thanks
Osama</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />
I just want to ask why the informed 2&#215;1 coincides with the 1&#215;2 system regarding the BER? As we know we have &#8216;Array Gain&#8217; in the latter scenario and we don&#8217;t have it in the former one.<br />
Does this have to do with Eb/No instead of SNR?<br />
Thanks<br />
Osama</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krishna Sankar</title>
		<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2009/04/13/transmit-beamforming/#comment-24434</link>
		<dc:creator>Krishna Sankar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dsplog.com/?p=535#comment-24434</guid>
		<description>@seynabou diene: Sorry, did not understand multi-beam vs single-beam. Is it multi-user vs single-user?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@seynabou diene: Sorry, did not understand multi-beam vs single-beam. Is it multi-user vs single-user?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krishna Sankar</title>
		<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2009/04/13/transmit-beamforming/#comment-24355</link>
		<dc:creator>Krishna Sankar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dsplog.com/?p=535#comment-24355</guid>
		<description>@Raja: Where you able to get the simulation models up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Raja: Where you able to get the simulation models up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raja</title>
		<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2009/04/13/transmit-beamforming/#comment-22102</link>
		<dc:creator>Raja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 05:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dsplog.com/?p=535#comment-22102</guid>
		<description>Hi krishna,
                  this is raja, i am doing research in the area of transmit beamforming by using SVD and i have use the rayleigh channel and MRC at the receiver...here mainly i concentrate on using different modulatin BPSK and 16-QAM and got the graph for BER vs SNR......i dont know how to derive the equations for BER calculation.....can u help me please.......i am waiting for ur reply plz.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi krishna,<br />
                  this is raja, i am doing research in the area of transmit beamforming by using SVD and i have use the rayleigh channel and MRC at the receiver&#8230;here mainly i concentrate on using different modulatin BPSK and 16-QAM and got the graph for BER vs SNR&#8230;&#8230;i dont know how to derive the equations for BER calculation&#8230;..can u help me please&#8230;&#8230;.i am waiting for ur reply plz&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.dsplog.com @ 2012-02-11 00:10:53 -->
