<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comparing BPSK, QPSK, 4PAM, 16QAM, 16PSK, 64QAM and 32PSK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dsplog.com/2008/07/08/compare-bpsk-qpsk-4pam-16qam-16psk-64qam-32psk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2008/07/08/compare-bpsk-qpsk-4pam-16qam-16psk-64qam-32psk/</link>
	<description>Signal Processing for Communication</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:36:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Krishna Sankar</title>
		<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2008/07/08/compare-bpsk-qpsk-4pam-16qam-16psk-64qam-32psk/#comment-31718</link>
		<dc:creator>Krishna Sankar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 00:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dsplog.com/?p=195#comment-31718</guid>
		<description>@Stud: The links
[bpsk] http://www.dsplog.com/2007/08/05/bit-error-probability-for-bpsk-modulation/ 
[qpsk] http://www.dsplog.com/2007/11/06/symbol-error-rate-for-4-qam/ 
[16psk] http://www.dsplog.com/2008/03/18/symbol-error-rate-for-16psk/ 
(The error rate formula is provided for M-PSK case. You can adapt it for 8-psk case)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Stud: The links<br />
[bpsk] <a href="http://www.dsplog.com/2007/08/05/bit-error-probability-for-bpsk-modulation/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dsplog.com/2007/08/05/bit-error-probability-for-bpsk-modulation/</a><br />
[qpsk] <a href="http://www.dsplog.com/2007/11/06/symbol-error-rate-for-4-qam/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dsplog.com/2007/11/06/symbol-error-rate-for-4-qam/</a><br />
[16psk] <a href="http://www.dsplog.com/2008/03/18/symbol-error-rate-for-16psk/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dsplog.com/2008/03/18/symbol-error-rate-for-16psk/</a><br />
(The error rate formula is provided for M-PSK case. You can adapt it for 8-psk case)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stud</title>
		<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2008/07/08/compare-bpsk-qpsk-4pam-16qam-16psk-64qam-32psk/#comment-31399</link>
		<dc:creator>Stud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dsplog.com/?p=195#comment-31399</guid>
		<description>Sir,

can u give me the matlab code for the BER compersion of conventional BPSK, QPSK and 8PSK over an AWGN channel.

Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir,</p>
<p>can u give me the matlab code for the BER compersion of conventional BPSK, QPSK and 8PSK over an AWGN channel.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krishna Sankar</title>
		<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2008/07/08/compare-bpsk-qpsk-4pam-16qam-16psk-64qam-32psk/#comment-25806</link>
		<dc:creator>Krishna Sankar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dsplog.com/?p=195#comment-25806</guid>
		<description>@azura: Some posts discussing OFDM can be found @ http://www.dsplog.com/tag/ofdm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@azura: Some posts discussing OFDM can be found @ <a href="http://www.dsplog.com/tag/ofdm" rel="nofollow">http://www.dsplog.com/tag/ofdm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azura</title>
		<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2008/07/08/compare-bpsk-qpsk-4pam-16qam-16psk-64qam-32psk/#comment-25761</link>
		<dc:creator>azura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 06:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dsplog.com/?p=195#comment-25761</guid>
		<description>hello sir ..
i&#039;m doing my final project..
do you have matlab simulation for ber performance in ofdm system of various modulation technique in self cancellation in OFDM..
 please help me..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello sir ..<br />
i&#8217;m doing my final project..<br />
do you have matlab simulation for ber performance in ofdm system of various modulation technique in self cancellation in OFDM..<br />
 please help me..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krishna Sankar</title>
		<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2008/07/08/compare-bpsk-qpsk-4pam-16qam-16psk-64qam-32psk/#comment-24716</link>
		<dc:creator>Krishna Sankar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 23:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dsplog.com/?p=195#comment-24716</guid>
		<description>@Amit: Sorry, no</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Amit: Sorry, no</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krishna Sankar</title>
		<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2008/07/08/compare-bpsk-qpsk-4pam-16qam-16psk-64qam-32psk/#comment-24668</link>
		<dc:creator>Krishna Sankar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 23:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dsplog.com/?p=195#comment-24668</guid>
		<description>@shubrodeep: You can look at some posts discussed under 
http://www.dsplog.com/2009/11/29/ber-bpsk-isi-channel-zero-forcing-equalization/ 
http://www.dsplog.com/2010/01/24/ber-bpsk-isi-channel-mmse-equalization/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@shubrodeep: You can look at some posts discussed under<br />
<a href="http://www.dsplog.com/2009/11/29/ber-bpsk-isi-channel-zero-forcing-equalization/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dsplog.com/2009/11/29/ber-bpsk-isi-channel-zero-forcing-equalization/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.dsplog.com/2010/01/24/ber-bpsk-isi-channel-mmse-equalization/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dsplog.com/2010/01/24/ber-bpsk-isi-channel-mmse-equalization/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krishna Sankar</title>
		<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2008/07/08/compare-bpsk-qpsk-4pam-16qam-16psk-64qam-32psk/#comment-24442</link>
		<dc:creator>Krishna Sankar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dsplog.com/?p=195#comment-24442</guid>
		<description>@batman: If the symbol duration is T, the minimum bandwidth required (with sinc shaped pulse shaping) is 1/T (from -1/2T to 1/2T). With higher order modulations, for the same data rate, we can have longer symbol durations there by reducing the bandwidth. Please lookinto the section Bandwidth requirements and Capacity in the article in dspdesignline.com http://www.dspdesignline.com/howto/208801783;jsessionid=BWJIYHNJDMGCPQE1GHOSKH4ATMY32JVN?pgno=2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@batman: If the symbol duration is T, the minimum bandwidth required (with sinc shaped pulse shaping) is 1/T (from -1/2T to 1/2T). With higher order modulations, for the same data rate, we can have longer symbol durations there by reducing the bandwidth. Please lookinto the section Bandwidth requirements and Capacity in the article in dspdesignline.com <a href="http://www.dspdesignline.com/howto/208801783;jsessionid=BWJIYHNJDMGCPQE1GHOSKH4ATMY32JVN?pgno=2" rel="nofollow">http://www.dspdesignline.com/howto/208801783;jsessionid=BWJIYHNJDMGCPQE1GHOSKH4ATMY32JVN?pgno=2</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
