<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comparing 16PSK vs 16QAM for symbol error rate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dsplog.com/2008/03/29/comparing-16psk-vs-16qam-for-symbol-error-rate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2008/03/29/comparing-16psk-vs-16qam-for-symbol-error-rate/</link>
	<description>Signal Processing for Communication</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:03:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SYED ABDULLAH ABBAS</title>
		<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2008/03/29/comparing-16psk-vs-16qam-for-symbol-error-rate/#comment-95698</link>
		<dc:creator>SYED ABDULLAH ABBAS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 08:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dsplog.com/2008/03/29/comparing-16psk-vs-16qam-for-symbol-error-rate/#comment-95698</guid>
		<description>@irshad. Contact me at mrniceshah@yahoo.com. and i will give you the code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@irshad. Contact me at <a href="mailto:mrniceshah@yahoo.com">mrniceshah@yahoo.com</a>. and i will give you the code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krishna Sankar</title>
		<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2008/03/29/comparing-16psk-vs-16qam-for-symbol-error-rate/#comment-95594</link>
		<dc:creator>Krishna Sankar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 01:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dsplog.com/2008/03/29/comparing-16psk-vs-16qam-for-symbol-error-rate/#comment-95594</guid>
		<description>@irshad:I do not have any direct simulations handy, but I would assume it is simple for you to adapt 
http://www.dsplog.com/2008/03/18/symbol-error-rate-for-16psk/  and
http://www.dsplog.com/2008/08/10/ber-bpsk-rayleigh-channel/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@irshad:I do not have any direct simulations handy, but I would assume it is simple for you to adapt<br />
<a href="http://www.dsplog.com/2008/03/18/symbol-error-rate-for-16psk/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dsplog.com/2008/03/18/symbol-error-rate-for-16psk/</a>  and<br />
<a href="http://www.dsplog.com/2008/08/10/ber-bpsk-rayleigh-channel/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dsplog.com/2008/08/10/ber-bpsk-rayleigh-channel/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: irshad</title>
		<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2008/03/29/comparing-16psk-vs-16qam-for-symbol-error-rate/#comment-94098</link>
		<dc:creator>irshad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 13:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dsplog.com/2008/03/29/comparing-16psk-vs-16qam-for-symbol-error-rate/#comment-94098</guid>
		<description>i need 8psk matlab code in Rayleigh channel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i need 8psk matlab code in Rayleigh channel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syed Abdullah Abbas</title>
		<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2008/03/29/comparing-16psk-vs-16qam-for-symbol-error-rate/#comment-30094</link>
		<dc:creator>Syed Abdullah Abbas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 05:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dsplog.com/2008/03/29/comparing-16psk-vs-16qam-for-symbol-error-rate/#comment-30094</guid>
		<description>hi, u can consult me if u have problem with matlab coding,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi, u can consult me if u have problem with matlab coding,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krishna Sankar</title>
		<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2008/03/29/comparing-16psk-vs-16qam-for-symbol-error-rate/#comment-26366</link>
		<dc:creator>Krishna Sankar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 09:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dsplog.com/2008/03/29/comparing-16psk-vs-16qam-for-symbol-error-rate/#comment-26366</guid>
		<description>@eca: How do you set the threshold? Is it based on BER constraint?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@eca: How do you set the threshold? Is it based on BER constraint?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eca</title>
		<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2008/03/29/comparing-16psk-vs-16qam-for-symbol-error-rate/#comment-25989</link>
		<dc:creator>eca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 01:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dsplog.com/2008/03/29/comparing-16psk-vs-16qam-for-symbol-error-rate/#comment-25989</guid>
		<description>dear sir..
please help me,,
 I am a EEPIS college student who was working on the final task of power control for rain attenuation ... I&#039;m confused with the usage for m-PSK tresshold what is the value of SNR tresshol for example 16 PSK, and from which the empirical calculation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dear sir..<br />
please help me,,<br />
 I am a EEPIS college student who was working on the final task of power control for rain attenuation &#8230; I&#8217;m confused with the usage for m-PSK tresshold what is the value of SNR tresshol for example 16 PSK, and from which the empirical calculation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krishna Sankar</title>
		<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2008/03/29/comparing-16psk-vs-16qam-for-symbol-error-rate/#comment-24653</link>
		<dc:creator>Krishna Sankar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 22:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dsplog.com/2008/03/29/comparing-16psk-vs-16qam-for-symbol-error-rate/#comment-24653</guid>
		<description>@R B Patil: Please refer to the post on http://www.dsplog.com/2008/07/08/compare-bpsk-qpsk-4pam-16qam-16psk-64qam-32psk/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@R B Patil: Please refer to the post on <a href="http://www.dsplog.com/2008/07/08/compare-bpsk-qpsk-4pam-16qam-16psk-64qam-32psk/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dsplog.com/2008/07/08/compare-bpsk-qpsk-4pam-16qam-16psk-64qam-32psk/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.dsplog.com @ 2012-02-11 01:08:43 -->
