<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cylcic prefix in Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dsplog.com/2008/02/17/cylcic-prefix-in-orthogonal-frequency-division-multiplexing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2008/02/17/cylcic-prefix-in-orthogonal-frequency-division-multiplexing/</link>
	<description>Signal Processing for Communication</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:36:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ELIJAH.LEE</title>
		<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2008/02/17/cylcic-prefix-in-orthogonal-frequency-division-multiplexing/#comment-27014</link>
		<dc:creator>ELIJAH.LEE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 13:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dsplog.com/2008/02/17/cylcic-prefix-in-orthogonal-frequency-division-multiplexing/#comment-27014</guid>
		<description>Thx ur nice work!I like your website very much!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thx ur nice work!I like your website very much!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krishna Sankar</title>
		<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2008/02/17/cylcic-prefix-in-orthogonal-frequency-division-multiplexing/#comment-24707</link>
		<dc:creator>Krishna Sankar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 23:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dsplog.com/2008/02/17/cylcic-prefix-in-orthogonal-frequency-division-multiplexing/#comment-24707</guid>
		<description>@lakshmi: Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@lakshmi: Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krishna Sankar</title>
		<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2008/02/17/cylcic-prefix-in-orthogonal-frequency-division-multiplexing/#comment-24357</link>
		<dc:creator>Krishna Sankar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dsplog.com/2008/02/17/cylcic-prefix-in-orthogonal-frequency-division-multiplexing/#comment-24357</guid>
		<description>@sowmia: Sure, please ask questions. I will answer to the best of my knowledge</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@sowmia: Sure, please ask questions. I will answer to the best of my knowledge</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krishna Sankar</title>
		<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2008/02/17/cylcic-prefix-in-orthogonal-frequency-division-multiplexing/#comment-24345</link>
		<dc:creator>Krishna Sankar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dsplog.com/2008/02/17/cylcic-prefix-in-orthogonal-frequency-division-multiplexing/#comment-24345</guid>
		<description>@Eric Cheung: MY replies
a) Yes. No interference between the subcarriers
b) No. Each subcarrier can undergo a different phase and amplitude change. 

The logic is that : if sin(wt) and sin(2wt) are orthogonal, then Asin(wt) and Bsin(wt+phi) is also orthogonal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Eric Cheung: MY replies<br />
a) Yes. No interference between the subcarriers<br />
b) No. Each subcarrier can undergo a different phase and amplitude change. </p>
<p>The logic is that : if sin(wt) and sin(2wt) are orthogonal, then Asin(wt) and Bsin(wt+phi) is also orthogonal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Cheung</title>
		<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2008/02/17/cylcic-prefix-in-orthogonal-frequency-division-multiplexing/#comment-22557</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Cheung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 12:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dsplog.com/2008/02/17/cylcic-prefix-in-orthogonal-frequency-division-multiplexing/#comment-22557</guid>
		<description>Hi，
In this article you said&#039;…eventhough the individual subcarriers undergo phase and amplitude change, as the frequency is not affected, there is no interference between the subcarriers.&#039;
a) Do you mean the orthogonality between differenet subcarriers will be kept?
b) And is it because all the other subcarriers in the same signal undergo the same amout change in phase?
If my opinion is not correct,then how does it works in detail? 

Thanks for your help!
Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi，<br />
In this article you said&#8217;…eventhough the individual subcarriers undergo phase and amplitude change, as the frequency is not affected, there is no interference between the subcarriers.&#8217;<br />
a) Do you mean the orthogonality between differenet subcarriers will be kept?<br />
b) And is it because all the other subcarriers in the same signal undergo the same amout change in phase?<br />
If my opinion is not correct,then how does it works in detail? </p>
<p>Thanks for your help!<br />
Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sowmia</title>
		<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2008/02/17/cylcic-prefix-in-orthogonal-frequency-division-multiplexing/#comment-22051</link>
		<dc:creator>sowmia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 12:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dsplog.com/2008/02/17/cylcic-prefix-in-orthogonal-frequency-division-multiplexing/#comment-22051</guid>
		<description>very useful site and ur explanations are realy good.Iam working on an project in mimo ofdm i want to design  an ofdm and use mimo in it . i would be thankful if u could help me.thanking u in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very useful site and ur explanations are realy good.Iam working on an project in mimo ofdm i want to design  an ofdm and use mimo in it . i would be thankful if u could help me.thanking u in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lakshmi</title>
		<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2008/02/17/cylcic-prefix-in-orthogonal-frequency-division-multiplexing/#comment-18741</link>
		<dc:creator>lakshmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 09:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dsplog.com/2008/02/17/cylcic-prefix-in-orthogonal-frequency-division-multiplexing/#comment-18741</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m working on ofdm.very useful website.thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m working on ofdm.very useful website.thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
