<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sigma delta modulation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dsplog.com/2007/04/03/sigma-delta-modulation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2007/04/03/sigma-delta-modulation/</link>
	<description>Signal Processing for Communication</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:03:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krishna Sankar</title>
		<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2007/04/03/sigma-delta-modulation/#comment-56449</link>
		<dc:creator>Krishna Sankar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 00:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dsplog.com/2007/04/03/sigma-delta-modulation/#comment-56449</guid>
		<description>@sudarshan: Let&#039;s discuss in the comment section. More people can track the conversation, if needed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@sudarshan: Let&#8217;s discuss in the comment section. More people can track the conversation, if needed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sudarshan</title>
		<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2007/04/03/sigma-delta-modulation/#comment-56418</link>
		<dc:creator>sudarshan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 18:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dsplog.com/2007/04/03/sigma-delta-modulation/#comment-56418</guid>
		<description>hii,

nice to meet you.
i am working on sigma delta adc
can you send a mail to this id,
see you soon. we shall discuss there ..!
 thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hii,</p>
<p>nice to meet you.<br />
i am working on sigma delta adc<br />
can you send a mail to this id,<br />
see you soon. we shall discuss there ..!<br />
 thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krishna</title>
		<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2007/04/03/sigma-delta-modulation/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Krishna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 02:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dsplog.com/2007/04/03/sigma-delta-modulation/#comment-205</guid>
		<description>@Yahia: I have worked only on zero-IF radios till date. So, I do not know enough to comment. 

I recall reading about bandpass sampling wherein the spectral replicas at the integer multiples of sampling frequency is used for down conversion. 

Is the non-IQ sampling an advanced version of bandpass sampling? If you have any pointers, it will be helpful. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Yahia: I have worked only on zero-IF radios till date. So, I do not know enough to comment. </p>
<p>I recall reading about bandpass sampling wherein the spectral replicas at the integer multiples of sampling frequency is used for down conversion. </p>
<p>Is the non-IQ sampling an advanced version of bandpass sampling? If you have any pointers, it will be helpful. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yahia</title>
		<link>http://www.dsplog.com/2007/04/03/sigma-delta-modulation/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dsplog.com/2007/04/03/sigma-delta-modulation/#comment-200</guid>
		<description>I would like to add a comment on ADC sampling for IF signals.

I used to think that there is a pereference to choose fs=4IF since that will lead to an efficient mixer implementation (no multiplier is needed). 
However, I have read recently about non IQ sampling which perfers that fs=(M/N)IF to avoid the IF harmonics to fall on the IF signal.

Between these two opinions, which one is really used in industry?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to add a comment on ADC sampling for IF signals.</p>
<p>I used to think that there is a pereference to choose fs=4IF since that will lead to an efficient mixer implementation (no multiplier is needed).<br />
However, I have read recently about non IQ sampling which perfers that fs=(M/N)IF to avoid the IF harmonics to fall on the IF signal.</p>
<p>Between these two opinions, which one is really used in industry?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.dsplog.com @ 2012-02-11 00:19:30 -->
